WitrynaNamit Sharma Vs. Union of India [September 13, 2012] 33. Gajoo Vs. State of Uttarakhand [September 13, 2012] 34. Chairman & CEO, NOIDA & ANR. Vs. Mange … WitrynaNamit Sharma V. Union Of India (6) April 1, 2014 by Balwinder Turki. Share this on WhatsApp. Previous Part. ... (See S.P. Sampath Kumar v. Union of India.) The protagonists of specialist tribunals, who simultaneously with their establishment want exclusion of the writ jurisdiction of the High Courts in regard to matters entrusted for ...
Union of India v Namit Sharma on 16 April 2013 - LawyerServices
Witryna18 paź 2010 · Namit Sharma: Union of India: 13/09/2012: View: 8: Review Petition [C] No.2309 of 2012 in WP [C] No.210 of 2012 with Review Petition [C] No.2675 of 2012 in WP[C] No.210 of 2012: RTI: Union of India,State of Rajasthan & Anr. Namit Sharma: 03/09/2013: View: 9: Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 27734 of 2012: RTI: Girish … Witryna3 maj 2024 · National Board of Accreditation Is Not an Administrative Authority ... ... Search great deal getaways facebook
Court Decisions on RTI [Right to Information Wiki]
Witryna7 lut 2024 · Abstract. The Rajasthan Supreme Court publicly interest litigation (Nikhil Soni v. Union of India) criminalized the traditional religious practice of the Jain community … Witryna6 godz. temu · Amit Shah, India's Union Home Minister, has urged the people of Bengal to grant at least 35 seats out of the state's 42 to the BJP in order to improve "Narendra Modi's hands" and end the "reign of terror" in Bengal. If the BJP receives more than 35 seats in the 2024 elections, the Trinamool government will be removed from Bengal … WitrynaThe correct answer is Namit Sharma v/s Union of India. Key Points. Namit Sharma v/s Union of India:- In September 2012, the Supreme Court took the decision on the … great deal all inclusive vacations